Skip to content

GWW vs SWK: Dividend Comparison

GWW$1,139.68
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
Industrials
vs
SWK$91.08
Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
Industrials

Dividend data as of

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) are both in the Industrials sector, making them natural rivals for dividend investors. SWK offers a significantly higher 3.60% yield compared to GWW's 0.74%, a gap of 2.85%. For dividend growth, GWW leads with a 5-year CAGR of 16.1% versus SWK's 2.6%. Both stocks carry a "Safe" dividend safety rating. SWK is a Dividend Aristocrat with 28 years of consecutive increases.

Verdict

Best for Income
SWK
Higher yield at 3.60%
Best for Growth
GWW
5yr CAGR of 16.1%
Best for Safety
SWK
Lower payout ratio (1%)
Metric
Price
$1,139.68
$91.08
Dividend Yield
0.74%
3.60%
Annual Dividend
$8.83
$3.30
5yr Div CAGR
16.1%
2.6%
3yr Div CAGR
25.8%
1.2%
Consecutive Years
0
28
Payout Ratio
24.94%
1.25%
P/E Ratio
—
—
Market Cap
—
—
Income on $10k
$74/yr
$360/yr

Yield Analysis

GWW
0.74%
SWK
3.60%

SWK yields 2.85% more than GWW. In dollar terms, GWW pays $8.83/share vs SWK's $3.30/share annually.

Dividend Growth

GWW 5yr CAGR
16.1%
accelerating
SWK 5yr CAGR
2.6%
decelerating

GWW: Dividend growth is accelerating — the 3-year CAGR of 25.8% exceeds the 5-year rate of 16.1% and the 10-year rate of 10.3%.

SWK: Dividend growth is slowing — the 3-year CAGR of 1.2% trails the 5-year rate of 2.6% and the 10-year rate of 4.3%.

Dividend Safety

GWW
Safe
Payout Ratio25%
SWK
Safe
Payout Ratio1%

GWW: The payout ratio of 25% is well within sustainable levels, leaving room for future increases. Earnings cover the dividend 4.0x.

SWK: The payout ratio of 1% is well within sustainable levels, leaving room for future increases. Earnings cover the dividend 0.8x.

Estimated Annual Dividend Income

Based on current dividend yields. Actual income may vary.

Investment
GWW
SWK
$10,000
$74/yr
$360/yr
$50,000
$372/yr
$1,798/yr
$100,000
$743/yr
$3,596/yr

What does $10,000 buy in GWW vs SWK today?

At $1139.68 per share, $10,000 buys about 8.8 shares of W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Each share pays $8.83 per year in dividends, so the position starts out generating roughly $77 per year — about $6 a month.

At $91.08 per share, $10,000 buys about 109.8 shares of Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK). Each share pays $3.30 per year in dividends, so the position starts out generating roughly $362 per year — about $30 a month.

SWK is the larger income stream from day one: $285 per year more on the same $10,000 invested.

What could $10,000 of GWW or SWK income look like in 10 years?

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) has raised its dividend about 16.1% a year over the past five years. If that pace held, the $74 per year that $10,000 generates today at the current 0.74% yield would reach $331 per year by 2036 — a 3.3% yield on the original cost.

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) has raised its dividend about 2.6% a year over the past five years. If that pace held, the $360 per year that $10,000 generates today at the current 3.60% yield would reach $464 per year by 2036 — a 4.6% yield on the original cost.

On those trailing rates, SWK pays more in 2036: $464 versus $331 per year. The projection assumes each five-year growth rate persists and no dividends are reinvested — real payouts will differ.

When would GWW's dividend growth overtake SWK's higher yield?

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) yields less today (0.74% vs 3.60%) but has grown its dividend faster — 16.1% vs 2.6% a year over the past five years. If both trends continued, a $10,000 position in GWW would start out-earning the same position in SWK around 2039 (roughly 13 years from now), paying about $518 per year at the crossover. Before that point, SWK pays more each year; after it, the gap compounds in GWW's favor.

Can GWW and SWK afford their dividends?

W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) earns $35.35 per share against $8.83 paid out in dividends — 4.0x coverage (a 25% payout ratio).

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) earns $2.65 per share against $3.30 paid out in dividends — 0.8x coverage (a 1% payout ratio).

GWW's wider coverage leaves more cushion if earnings dip. As a rule of thumb, coverage below about 1.5x (a payout ratio above ~65%) is where a dividend starts to look stretched — worth watching for SWK if earnings weaken.

Which fits an early-retirement income portfolio better, GWW or SWK?

For income you need right now, Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK) leads: $100,000 invested today pays about $300 a month at the current 3.60% yield, versus $62 a month from W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 0.74%.

With a decade or more before the income is needed, GWW's faster dividend growth (16.1% vs 2.6% a year) matters more than the starting yield — raises compound into the larger paycheck over time.

On consistency: SWK has raised its dividend 28 consecutive years.

Many income investors simply hold both — the mix pairs current yield with growth and spreads single-name risk. Whichever way you lean, dividends are never guaranteed; recheck the payout each quarter rather than setting and forgetting.

$10,000 with DRIP: projected annual income

If each holding keeps raising its dividend at its real 5-year rate and every payment is reinvested, a $10,000 position pays $356/yr in GWW vs $661/yr in SWK by year 10.

Assumes dividends are reinvested at the current yield and grow at each holding's trailing 5-year dividend CAGR. A projection, not a prediction — no price appreciation modeled.

Track GWW and SWK in your portfolio

See your real income from both — forward projections, yield on cost, and dividend safety signals. Sync your brokerage free for 30 days, or track holdings manually on the free plan.

Choosing a tracker? See the best dividend trackers compared.

Frequently Asked Questions

This tool is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute investment, financial, tax, or legal advice. Consult a licensed professional before making investment decisions.

Past performance does not guarantee future results. All projections are hypothetical estimates based on user-provided inputs and may differ materially from actual outcomes.

By using this tool you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.